Venables, Politicians and Victims
Maybe I’m wrong, but I believe that it was poor political leadership that allowed the spectacular expression of national rage to get out of control following the murder of James Bulger by Jon Venables and Robert Thompson. When they were sentenced to a minimum of ten years in custody by their trial judge the Sun newspaper immediately launched a campaign to have their time to be spent in custody increased. According to Chris Rycroft-Davis, who at the time was a Sun headline writer, the then home secretary Michael Howard would have none of it. “He felt that we were speaking out of turn,” says Rycroft-Davis, “that we were trying to influence the way the courts ran.” When confronted with a petition signed by several hundred thousand Sun readers, Howard caved in and overruled the judge, substituting an extra-judicial 15-year minimum on Venables and Thompson. Howard’s action was a vile self-serving political attack on the judicial process which served neither justice or common sense. Neither did it help the family of James Bulger, who have been treated appallingly by politicians throughout this whole tragic affair. In the aftermath of Jon Venables’ arrest the same pitiable leadership qualities are being demonstrated all over again. Why should James Bulger’s family have had to wait until pressure from the popular press forced the Justice secretary Jack Straw to agree to meet them? Why wasn’t that family the first concern of the Ministry of Justice instead of what the media was saying? And current home secretary Alan Johnson’s performance on various news programmes last week, bumbling and prevaricating was excruciatingly pathetic. Successive governments over the past two decades have proved over and over that they have little genuine interest in the needs of victims of crime and about the same amount of respect for the sensitivities that are necessary in their attitudes towards the families of murder victims. What chance true justice then in their treatment of perpetrators?







